Performance Benchmark Jewelry Retouching

Description of your first forum.
Post Reply
Zarin
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2022 6:33 am

Performance Benchmark Jewelry Retouching

Post by Zarin »

ment conducted by Google from around March 13-20. The goal was to eliminate several search results for queries that, in theory, did not need it. If you were returning from a trip to the west coast, for example, and wondering what time it was back on the east coast, you would Jewelry Retouching search for “time est” and see this: Google Zero Search Results Time Query If you were actually looking for an obscure band from the 90s called Time Est, or were planning on going on an online shopping spree for Timex watches, you would be deeply disappointed Jewelry Retouching or bored. This "Show All Results" button would be an entirely new and separate button to click on. Pain in the ass, right? I say. We will come back to this shortly. When clicked, the button Jewelry Retouching would reveal a standard Google search page, a la: Google zero search results time query 2 Other "simple" queries, such as those involving calculations or unit conversions, would show similar no-result results: Google Zero Search Results Jewelry Retouching Distance Query Since Google never made an official announcement, there was understandably quite a bit of chatter among SEOs – what was the point of all this? Google's Danny Sullivan provided the answer via Twitter: Google Zero Danny Sullivan Search Results Impressive. A condensed view means faster loading time.


Faster loading time means more efficiency. Nothing new, but it seemed like a promising concept. Sullivan went on to tweet that zero search results could reduce Jewelry Retouching load times by up to half a second. That seems pretty insignificant, but it's actually not, especially when you're in an area where load times naturally increase (like on an airplane, for example, where you could very realistically perform this Jewelry Retouching query "time is".) Initial rollouts received enough positive response that Google felt comfortable releasing Zero Search Results to the world. They even provided a "Send Feedback" panel at the bottom of zero Jewelry Retouching search results pages to collect various user experience information. Feedback on Google Zero search results And of course, since Google is Google, it could monitor the effectiveness of the experiment based on how often the "Show all Jewelry Retouching results" button was clicked and for which queries. What were the results? As quickly as it arrived, Zero Search Results disappeared. Google received a lot of backlash early on from SEOs worried about a "slippery slope" - for example, what if Google extended zero search results to queries that under normal circumstances would generate meaningful traffic for a wide range of brands? Going back to our previous airplane example: let's say flight queries Jewelry Retouching started returning only featured snippets from Google Flights. Brands like Kayak and Expedia stand to lose significant amounts of traffic and revenue. Another nail in the proverbial “SEO is dead” coffin, right? The experiment also Jewelry Retouching caused some confusion among users during its first global push. Barry Schwartz points out a few oversights in this Search Engine Roundtable article – first, the elimination of Time Magazine from the search results returned Jewelry Retouching for the query “time”; and second, people looking for a hot “date in London” receiving a snippet featuring the calendar date in London. These are the two cases where Google misunderstood the true intent of the query. Date of Google Zero search results In Google's defense, if you're really looking for a date, there has to be a better Jewelry Retouching way. You will also notice the ads in the Zero SERP above. This example and other examples of ad-only SERPs have come to Google's attention, with many wondering about the potential implications for paid search.


Why wouldn't Google just disable ads on zero search results pages? In fact, SERPs like the one pictured above weren't deliberate. Google search quality analyst Nathan Johns went so far as to call them “edge cases,” i.e. unintended bugs in the system: Google Zero Nathan Jewelry Retouching Johns Search Results While Google corrected most of these initial oversights, and if he (mainly Danny Sullivan) managed to quell the tide of "slippery Jewelry Retouching slope" concern via Twitter, Google would not extend zero search results outside local time, unit conversions, and calculations - The experiment ultimately couldn't survive the amount Jewelry Retouching of user error and voice revulsion it received. Danny sounded the death knell on March 20. A week was enough. Google Zero Danny Search Results No search results… 2.0? Could we see a renaissance of zero search results? Definitely! Do we want it? Ehhhh - the answer Jewelry Retouching gets a little more difficult. Faster and more relevant search results are unquestionably good for users. Zero search results will stick if Google can find a way to reimplement them without Jewelry Retouching sacrificing efficiency for intent. There is a niche of queries that zero search results are perfect for, and now Google has the data to find it. Still, questions remain. Danny Sullivan himself said Jewelry Retouching this update was all about speed, but there's no apparent benefit to hiding search results from users unless the snippets are exactly what they are . are lookinF
Post Reply